|
Which one of the following acronyms should
be important to you as an acro pilot? - R&B, B&C,
W&B, . Let’s see, R&B - nah, only if you like
it, B&C - maybe because a certified one goes for around
$500 plus, W&B - hot diggity dawg (flashing lights
sound of angel music) ahhh, let’s delve into this
murky subject. Of course I am referring to Weight and
Balance. The last contest I was tech inspecting revealed to
me some interesting view points on the subject. These view
points ranged from blissfully ignorant, to intentionally
ignorant, to just plain ignorant. I can count on one hand
how many actually had a "clue" as to what they must have in
order to comply with the tech inspector’s checklist
item labeled Weight & Balance. Now, before you think I
am preaching and chiding (actually I am), I would like to
point out a sage old aviator saying "if you’re gonna
bust a reg know what you’re bustin". Let’s get
one thing straight, I AM NOT ADVOCATING BUSTING REGS! My
purpose is to educate not pontificate. A quick refresher is
in order.
An airplane is a balancing act. It must
be within the balancing parameters (CG envelope) in order
to remain within balance - think of a teeter totter,
see-saw, whatever. The important thing is that if does not
balance then the aircraft and you have entered into the
test pilot regime. The actual point of balance is called
the center of gravity (CG) it has an envelope which allows
a small degree of travel fore and aft to accommodate shifts
in loading preferences. The Feds come along and state that
if it is to be a certified aircraft it must stall at 61
knots or less at max gross weight with the furthest aft CG.
If it cannot, the W&B limits must be adjusted until it
can do so. So what does this mean? Simply stated an
aircraft can fly outside of its CG limit, however it will
continue to become more and more unstable until it is
uncontrollable as the CG gets farther and farther out of
limits. The second factor has to do with the maximum weight
the aircraft can accommodate and still perform to the
requirements of Part 23. This part goes into millimetric
detail as to gust loads, climb gradients, design fuel loads
etc. Suffice to say after crunching numbers and looking at
a bunch of performance graph curves, a maximum weight for a
condition (normal and acro) is derived and then voila! you
have a CG envelope and maximum weight for an
aircraft. As you "ze pilot extraordinaire"
begin to cram your crap into the aircraft, fuel it up and
squeeze yourself into the cockpit the laws of physics begin
to apply themselves and those limits are starting to come
into play. "What?!" you say, "but I have a single seat
aircraft, surely (ok say it - ‘don’t call me
Shirley’) if it has one seat I can fly it with out
fear of exceeding those limits, after all what idiot would
design a single seat aircraft that could have its limits
exceeded when a solo pilot straps in to fly it". Well, let
me burst your bubble, any aircraft designed with one
seat can have its CG and weight exceeded. Now to be fair,
most of the time the weight part is not the problem, it is
the CG location. Some of you may know that I have been
looking for a new aircraft, as such I have flown a number
of different aerobatic aircraft. As I started to play
around with the W&B problems I was shocked to learn
that many of our most famous and trusted aircraft can
barely be flown legally according to their published
W&B data. If you weigh over 190 lbs with a chute, or if
you weigh less than 140lbs with a chute you will be amazed
at how many aircraft will have their CG fore and aft limits
exceeded. This does not mean to say that if you weigh less
than 190 or more than 140 you are bulletproof, it only
means to say that to assume anything when it comes to
W&B is foolhardy.
So what is the tech inspector looking for?
FAR’s state that you must have W&B figured out
for every flight. This means that to be in one hundred
percent compliance you must calculate a W&B each time
you fly, unless of course you fly the aircraft loaded the
same way every time. Then a pre-calculated W&B is
acceptable. This W&B data must include the current data
for you personally, not a theoretical. In other words
let’s say you weigh about 170, the weight and balance
data in your aircraft must show a situation with a pilot
who weighs about 170, not a pilot who weighs
200. If a Fed ramp checks your aircraft and you
don’t have an applicable W&B problem worked out,
you will be found in violation of Part 91.103 Pre-Flight
Action (b)-2. The tech inspector should be verifying that
you have a current (dated from your last aircraft empty
weight log book entry determination) and accurate weight
and balance problem for your particular conditions for that
particular day. If you can establish that you are in
compliance with a pre-computed W&B situation then that
is just fine. Handing the tech inspector a copy of the
"Sample Weight & Balance" from your aircraft manual
does not comply either with the FAR or IAC contest intent
and should be grounds for failing a tech inspection.
Don’t guess about your weight and
balance, figure it out and know what you are dealing
with. Then you will be making an educated decision as
to how to fly your aircraft as compared to having something
bite your butt "out of the blue". W&B is very simple,
but unless you are familiar with it can at first appear
confusing, if you have any questions or if you would like
me to help you get yours sorted out give me a call, I will
be happy to help.
Capt. Ron Spencer can be contacted via
email at gwiz@idsi.net - Ed.
|
|